[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341501404.2583.4267.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:16:44 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initialize the neighbour pointer of
rt6_info on allocation
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 15:18 +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> git commit 97cac082 (ipv6: Store route neighbour in rt6_info struct)
> added a neighbour pointer to rt6_info. Currently we don't initialize
> this pointer at allocation time. We assume this pointer to be valid
> if it is not a null pointer, so initialize it on allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index ceff71d..6cc6c88 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *ip6_dst_alloc(struct net *net,
> 0, 0, flags);
>
> if (rt) {
> - memset(&rt->rt6i_table, 0,
> + memset(&rt->n, 0,
> sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(struct dst_entry));
> rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers : net->ipv6.peers);
> }
Hmm, could we find a way to avoid this for future changes ?
We know dst_entry is the first field, so maybe :
if (rt) {
struct dst_entry *dst = (struct dst_entry *)rt;
memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists