[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF682EB.9040800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:17:15 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com>
To: "D. Stussy" <replies+newsgroups@...lvw.ampr.org>
CC: "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@...-arc.ampr.org>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel e1000 ethernet device, change in kernel v3.4, and jumbo
frames setting DENIED.
On 07/05/2012 04:53 PM, D. Stussy wrote:
> "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" wrote in message
> news:jjGoO-7l0-19@...ed-at.bofh.it...
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, D. Stussy wrote:
>> There has been some changes to the driver such that things like
>> checksum verification is offloaded from the CPU. However, this
>> blocks the ability to set a jumbo frame. The kernel does record an
>> error indicating that checksum offloading need be disabled fro jumbo
>> frame MTU sizes to be used. My e1000 interfaces use the 82574L
>> chipset.
>>
>> 1) Was this an intentional change?
>
> Yes, but I understand Intel is trying to come up with a way not to
> need it.
> ==============
> OK, found the modification. NETIF_F_RXHASH turned on by default in a
> modification ("Receive Packet Steering support") from January 26, 2012.
>
> Features which have no OFF setting should DEFAULT OFF and wait to be
> explicitly enabled. The change which was inserted is stupid.
> ==============
>
>> 2) How do I disable that function so I can set jumbo frames with
>> "ifconfig" or "ip"? I simply don't know what setting I need to
>> pass.
>
> ethtool can do it. Check its manpage, it can manipulate the various NIC
> offload engines, as well as other parameters such as dma ring buffer
> size,
> etc.
> ===============
> Got it: ethtool -K eth0 rx off
>
> However, I'd prefer to turn off hashing instead of the checksum and I
> didn't recognize a single setting which would do that. Under "ethtool
> -N", there seem to be 8 settings, but none of the options seemed to
> disable hashing (without simultaneously dropping packets). I still
> need help: What is the correct setting I need to disable this? I
> don't see a simple OFF setting.
>
> Else, this part of the patch should be reversed:
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6136,6 +6213,7 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev
> *pdev,
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX |
> NETIF_F_TSO |
> NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> + NETIF_F_RXHASH |
> NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_CSUM);
> --
Adding the more appropriate mailing lists of netdev and e1000-devel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (901 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists