[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120706065426.GF1869@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:54:26 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initialize the neighbour pointer of
rt6_info on allocation
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 15:18 +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >
> > if (rt) {
> > - memset(&rt->rt6i_table, 0,
> > + memset(&rt->n, 0,
> > sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(struct dst_entry));
> > rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers : net->ipv6.peers);
> > }
>
> Hmm, could we find a way to avoid this for future changes ?
>
> We know dst_entry is the first field, so maybe :
>
> if (rt) {
> struct dst_entry *dst = (struct dst_entry *)rt;
>
> memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
>
Yes, I think we need to do something like this.
I've just noticed that ip6_blackhole_route, xfrm_alloc_dst,
dn_route_output_slow and dn_route_input_slow have the same issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists