[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874npli5fd.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:51:02 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fail dentry revalidation after namespace change
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> writes:
> On 07/06/2012 01:37 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> writes:
>>
>>> When we change the namespace tag of a sysfs entry, the associated dentry
>>> is still kept around. readdir() will work correctly and not display the
>>> old entries, but open() will still succeed, so will reads and writes.
>>
>> Note reads and writes of file handles open before the move should
>> continue to work.
>
> Well, yes. But do you see it as a big problem?
>
> This can probably be fixed as well, but I foresee a big hackishness in
> the way =p
At the moment it looks like a feature.
The only reason we bounce between different instances of sysfs is
because of the unfortunate sysfs directory layout that we need
to remain compatible with.
But I don't see it making much of a difference either way.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists