[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709085827.GA10776@1984>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:58:27 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipset: timeout fixing bug broke SET
target special timeout value
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:29:03AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: pablo@...filter.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:39:38 +0200
>
> > + if (add_opt.timeout != IPSET_NO_TIMEOUT
> > + && add_opt.timeout > UINT_MAX/MSEC_PER_SEC)
>
> We do not write conditionals like this, with operators beginning
> a continued line. Instead, write this as:
>
> if (a &&
> b)
Oops, indeed, sorry. New patch attached.
I've also rebased my tree to include this change. Should I send a new
pull request?
Let me know what you prefer.
View attachment "0001-netfilter-ipset-timeout-fixing-bug-broke-SET-target-.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1502 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists