netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] asix: Fix checkpatch warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABkLObowkQHbOeONpchc=dsbh3zoAUX7=gjw_pp6F8dtGEovZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:48:39 +0200
From:	Christian Riesch <christian.riesch@...cron.at>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Allan Chou <allan@...x.com.tw>,
	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	Michael Riesch <michael@...sch.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] asix: Fix checkpatch warnings

Hi all,

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:43 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
>
>> Christian is clearly running checkpatch.pl as suggested in
>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches. He missed the part about "You should
>> be able to justify all violations that remain in your patch." and/or
>> didn't know about "fixing existing code is a waste of time".
>>
>> Given the extent of the changes Christian is making (factoring out
>> asix common code from model specific code), it's helpful to have clean
>> checkpatch runs. I don't believe it's a waste of time to apply this
>> patch. Is it conflicting with any other code changes that are in
>> flight now?
>
> It was a waste of time for me, at least (Since I was CCed for the
> patch), and just sent my personal opinion on checkpatch generated
> patches.
>
> Splitting a perfectly good line :
>
> netdev_err(dev->net, "Error reading PHYID register: %02x\n", ret);
>
> into
>
> netdev_err(dev->net, "Error reading PHYID register: %02x\n",
>            ret);
>
> is a clear sign of how stupid checkpatch is.
>
> And fact we can spend time on discussions about checkpatch is
> astonishing.
>
> Automatic tools should be smart and ease people tasks, not
> slowing them.

Thanks for your comments! I admit that I was just annoyed by the lots
of checkpatch warnings and therefore just brainlessly did everything
to make it stop complaining, there was not much thinking involved. I
will try to be more sensible when I put together the next version.

But first I'd like to draw your attention to the other patches in the
patchset :-) I asked a few questions in the cover letter [1] and I
would like to hear your opinion about it. Thanks a lot!

>
> Note that Christian patch serie in itself is good, I don't want to block
> it at all.

Thanks :-)

Regards, Christian


[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134157544400926&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html