[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341945120.3265.6030.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:32:00 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dave.taht@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
therbert@...gle.com, mattmathis@...gle.com, nanditad@...gle.com,
ncardwell@...gle.com, andrewmcgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:37 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > +
> > + if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> > + if ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
> > + (TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT | TCPF_ESTABLISHED))
> > + tcp_write_xmit(sk,
> > + tcp_current_mss(sk),
> > + 0, 0,
> > + GFP_ATOMIC);
> Is this case possible: app does a large send and immediately closes
> the socket. then
> the queue is throttled and tcp_write_xmit is called back when state is
> in TCP_FIN_WAIT1.
>
> I think tcp_write_xmit should continue regardless of the current state
> because the
> send maybe throttled/delayed but state change is synchronous.
>
I need testing some allowed states, I think.
Maybe I missed some states, but I dont think we should call
tcp_write_xmit() if socket is now in TIMEWAIT state ?
(because of tasklet delay, we might handle TX completion _after_ socket
state change)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists