netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] r8169: support RTL8168G

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120710090045.GA32387@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:00:45 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] r8169: support RTL8168G

(you should include a Signed-off-by)

Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> 1. Remove rtl_ocpdr_cond. No waiting is needed for mac_ocp_{write / read}.

Nit: it would not hurt to do a better job than me and save some commit noise
getting these things right before they pollute the history. :o)

> 2. Set ocp_base to OCP_STD_PHY_BASE after rtl8168g_1_hw_phy_config.

Can't it be stuffed into the firmware ?

The code does not explicitely switch from the PHY access context to
the extra OCP registers one and anything else in rtl8168g_1_hw_phy_config
seems to directly use the addresses it needs. So I'd expect the current
imbalance to come from the firmware, where it would make as much sense to
fix it
-> no imbalance after the firmware is applied
-> no useless instruction if the firmware is not used

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html