[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120710111242.GD14154@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:12:42 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] netvm: Propagate page->pfmemalloc from
skb_alloc_page to skb
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > I can update e1000 if you like but it's not critical
> > to do so and in fact getting a bug reporting saying that network swap
> > was slow on e1000 would be useful to me in its own way :)
> No, leave as it, I was just curious.
> One thing: Do you think it makes sense to you introduce
> #define GFP_NET_RX (GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_MEMALLOC)
>
> and use it within the receive path instead of GFP_ATOMIC?
>
For now, I'd prefer to keep the __GFP_MEMALLOC flag at the different
callsites because it forces people to think about what it means. I fear
that GFP_NET_RX may be too easy to misuse without thinking about what the
consequences are.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists