netdev - Re: [net-next patch v2] bnx2x: Add run-time CNIC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120710.052149.792836375666491854.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	meravs@...adcom.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eilong@...adcom.com, dmitry@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [net-next patch v2] bnx2x: Add run-time CNIC support

From: "Merav Sicron" <meravs@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:17:00 +0300

> There are still two advantages in disabling CNIC in bnx2x: Saving
> resources (MSI-X vector and memory) as well as reducing some latency.

But, nobody does this.  No end user can do this easily, this
is therefore of zero value to him.

> While it is true that distributions enable the CNIC Kconfig option, some
> users that care about resources and latency compile a kernel without it.

This, therefore, results in a terrible user experience.

> Can you please re-consider this patch?

Absolutely not.

Make it really dynamic, and properly configurable at run time, so
people don't have to go through hoops to get the "advantages" you
speak so highly of.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html