[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1341999341-1808-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:35:36 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] cgroup cls & netprio 'cleanups'
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Hi,
While looking a bit at the cls and netprio controller I found a
few things which I think are 'not optimal'.
The first patch makes sock_update_netprioidx() a bit smatter, so that
only on changed value the sk->sk_cgroup_prioidx is written and not
all the time.
The next two patches are changing the built. In case someone
builds a kernel with cgroup support but disabled cls or netprio
controller, there was still code added.
And the last two patches change the cls and netprio source files in
that way, that the use IS_BUILTIN and IS_MODULE as it used in the
header files.
The patches are against net-next.
cheers,
daniel
Daniel Wagner (5):
cgroup: Only update sk_cgrp_prioidx on change
cgroup: Do not add sock_update_classid() when CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP=0
cgroup: Do not add sock_update_netprioidx() when
CONFIG_NETPRIO_CGROUP=0
cgroup: Make builtin vs. module build ifdefs consistent
cgroup: Make builtin vs. module build ifdefs consistent
include/net/cls_cgroup.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/net/netprio_cgroup.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
include/net/sock.h | 8 --------
net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 6 +++---
net/core/sock.c | 14 +++++++++++---
net/sched/cls_cgroup.c | 6 +++---
6 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
1.7.11.1.165.g299666c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists