netdev - Re: UDP ordering when using multiple rx queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342004939.27284.28.camel@lb-tlvb-meravs.il.broadcom.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:08:59 +0300
From:	"Merav Sicron" <meravs@...adcom.com>
To:	"Jean-Michel Hautbois" <jhautbois@...il.com>
cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UDP ordering when using multiple rx queue

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 00:53 -0700, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:

> Several tests lead to a simple conclusion : when the NIC has only one
> RX queue, everything is ok (like be2net for instance), but when it has
> more than one RX queue, then I can have "lost packets".
> This is the case for bnx2x or mlx4 for instance.
>>From what you describe I assume that you use different source IP /
destination IP in each packet - is this something that you can control?
Because with the same IP addresses the traffic will be steered to the
same queue. 

> Here are my questions :
> - Is it possible to force a driver to use only one rx queue, even if
> it can use more without reloading the driver (and this is feasible
> only when a parameter exists for that !) ?
You can reduce the number of queues using "ethtool -L ethX combined 1".
Note however that it will cause automatic driver unload/load.

Thanks,
Merav


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html