netdev - Re: [PATCH] tc_util: fix incorrect bare number process in get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:51:29 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tc_util: fix incorrect bare number process in get_rate.

On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:24:50 +0800
Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> As the comment and manpage indicated that the bare number means
> bytes per second, so the division is not needed.
> ---
>  tc/tc_util.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tc/tc_util.c b/tc/tc_util.c
> index 926ed08..e8d89c1 100644
> --- a/tc/tc_util.c
> +++ b/tc/tc_util.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int get_rate(unsigned *rate, const char *str)
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	if (*p == '\0') {
> -		*rate = bps / 8.;	/* assume bytes/sec */
> +		*rate = bps;	/* assume bytes/sec */
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
Thanks for finding this. The documentation, code and comment do
all need to be the same!

But changing the code as you propose would break existing usage
by scripts. Instead, the man page and comment need to change
to match the reality of the existing application.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html