[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342048634.2613.66.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:17:14 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/11] sfc: Use dev_kfree_skb() in
efx_end_loopback()
Fix CID 102619 in the Coverity report on Linux.
efx_end_loopback() iterates over an array of skb pointers of which
some may be null (if efx_begin_loopback() failed). It should not use
dev_kfree_skb_irq(), which requires non-null pointers. In practice
this is safe because it does not run in interrupt context and
therefore always ends up calling dev_kfree_skb(), which does allow
null pointers. But we should make that explicit.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/selftest.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/selftest.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/selftest.c
index de4c006..ccc428f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/selftest.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int efx_end_loopback(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue,
skb = state->skbs[i];
if (skb && !skb_shared(skb))
++tx_done;
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ dev_kfree_skb(skb);
}
netif_tx_unlock_bh(efx->net_dev);
--
1.7.7.6
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists