| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120712.035840.603313259204428604.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:58:40 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@...il.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16] Handle redirects just like PMTU From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:45:33 +0200 > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 01:10 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> As described in my patch series from the other day, we need to >> rearrange redirect handling so that the local initiators of packets >> (sockets, tunnels, xfrms, etc.) that implement the protocols compute >> the route and pass this down into the ipv4/ipv6 routing code. >> >> These changes here do so by implementing a new dst_ops->redirect >> method. >> >> No more do we have this funny code that tries several different sets >> of routing keys to try and figure out which route the redirect should >> actually be applied to. >> >> No more do we have the problem wherein TOS rewriting causes problems >> for us. >> >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> > > Wow, this looks very good. > > I did a quick review and found no obvious problem. > > Bye bye ip_rt_redirect(), finally ;) Great. I'm feeling brave so I'll push this out to net-next after doing some more build validation.:) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists