lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120712.003700.49235222504944712.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:37:00 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@...il.com Cc: rick.jones2@...com, ycheng@...gle.com, dave.taht@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net, therbert@...gle.com, mattmathis@...gle.com, nanditad@...gle.com, ncardwell@...gle.com, andrewmcgr@...il.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:34:19 +0200 > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 01:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> The 10Gb receiver is a net-next kernel, but the 1Gb receiver is a 2.6.38 >> ubuntu kernel. They probably have very different TCP behavior. > > > I tested TSQ on bnx2x and 10Gb links. > > I get full rate even using 65536 bytes for > the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes tunable Great work Eric. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists