netdev - Re: resurrecting tcphealth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3436.1342229512@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:31:52 -0400
From:	valdis.kletnieks@...edu
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	"Piotr Sawuk" <a9702387@...t.univie.ac.at>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: resurrecting tcphealth

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:55:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger said:

> >+			/* Course retransmit inefficiency- this packet has been received twice. */
> >+			tp->dup_pkts_recv++;
>
> I don't understand that comment, could you use a better sentence please?

I think what was intended was:

/* Curse you, retransmit inefficiency! This packet has been received at least twice */

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped