netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:34:34 +0300
From:	Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.co.il>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree

On Thursday 12 July 2012 05:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/mlx4/device.h between commit 396f2feb05d7 ("mlx4_core:
> Implement mechanism for reserved Q_Keys") from the infiniband tree and
> commit 0ff1fb654bec ("{NET, IB}/mlx4: Add device managed flow steering
> firmware API") from the net-next tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
> as necessary.

Thanks, Stephen!

Your merge looks fine. Ack.

-Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html