[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5005AC4A.9030208@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:17:46 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il" <yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"amirv@...lanox.com" <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4_en: map entire pages to increase throughput
On 07/16/2012 10:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:27:57 -0700
>
>> That seems rather extraordinarily low - Power7 is supposed to be a
>> rather high performance CPU. The last time I noticed O(3Gbit/s) on
>> 10G for bulk transfer was before the advent of LRO/GRO - that was in
>> the x86 space though. Is mapping really that expensive with Power7?
>
> Unfortunately, IOMMU mappings are incredibly expensive. I see effects
> like this on Sparc too.
OK, so that has caused some dimm memory to get a small refresh - it ends
up being akin to if not actually a PIO yes? I recall schemes in drivers
in other stacks whereby "small" packets were copied because it was
cheaper to allocate/copy then it was to remap.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists