[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120717.132019.1633094178309164749.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: rick.jones2@...com, cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, amirv@...lanox.com,
leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4_en: map entire pages to increase throughput
From: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:10:08 -0500
> On 07/17/2012 01:17 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>> On 07/16/2012 10:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012
>>> 10:27:57 -0700
>>>
>>>> That seems rather extraordinarily low - Power7 is supposed to be
>>>> a rather high performance CPU. The last time I noticed
>>>> O(3Gbit/s) on 10G for bulk transfer was before the advent of
>>>> LRO/GRO - that was in the x86 space though. Is mapping really
>>>> that expensive with Power7?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, IOMMU mappings are incredibly expensive. I see
>>> effects like this on Sparc too.
>>
>> OK, so that has caused some dimm memory to get a small refresh - it
>> ends up being akin to if not actually a PIO yes? I recall schemes in
>> drivers in other stacks whereby "small" packets were copied because
>> it was cheaper to allocate/copy then it was to remap.
>
> On Power it ends up being an hcall to the hypervisor
This is true on sparc64 niagara systems as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists