[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5005D45D.1040302@genband.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:08:45 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To: Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
CC: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New commands to configure IOV features
On 07/17/2012 01:29 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> WRT SRIOV-nic devices, the thinking goes that protocol-level
> parameters associated with VFs should use protocol-specific interfaces,
> e.g., ethtool, ip link set, etc. for Ethernet VFs.
> Thus, the various protocol control functions/tools should
> be used to control VF parameters, as one would for a physical device
> of that protocol/class.
It seems to me that the mere act of creating one or more VFs is
something generic, applicable to all devices that are capable of it.
The details of configuring those VFs can then be handled by
protocol-specific interfaces.
I'm not too worried about the exact mechanism of doing it, as long as
it's ultimately scriptable--that is, if it's a C API then it would be
appreciated if there was a standard tool to call that implements it.
From that perspective a sysfs-based interface is ideal since it is
directly scriptable.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists