[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120716.225611.1570342975310166446.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: infrastation@...dex.ru
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix RTPROT_RA markup of RA routes w/nexthops
From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@...dex.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:45:50 +0400
> From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@...dex.ru>
>
> Userspace implementations of network routing protocols sometimes need to
> tell RA-originated IPv6 routes from other kernel routes to make proper
> routing decisions. This makes most sense for RA routes with nexthops,
> namely, default routes and Route Information routes.
>
> The intended mean of preserving RA route origin in a netlink message is
> through indicating RTPROT_RA as protocol code. Function rt6_fill_node()
> tried to do that for default routes, but its test condition was taken
> wrong. This change is modeled after the original mailing list posting
> by Jeff Haran. It fixes the test condition for default route case and
> sets the same behaviour for Route Information case (both types use
> nexthops). Handling of the 3rd RA route type, Prefix Information, is
> left unchanged, as it stands for interface connected routes (without
> nexthops).
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@...dex.ru>
Applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists