netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/mlx4_en: Add accelerated RFS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120718.143456.1078493346727092667.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	or.gerlitz@...il.com
Cc:	roland@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oren@...lanox.com,
	yevgenyp@...lanox.com, amirv@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/mlx4_en: Add accelerated RFS support

From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:22:42 +0300

> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:41 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
>> Please use CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL consistently to protect this feature
>> in your driver sources.
>>
>> Using CPU_RMAP in a few places is inconsistent, and not what other
>> drivers do.
> 
> We're indeed using CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL across the place, and only in two
> places which deal directly with rmap use CPU_RMAP. The latter is
> selected by RFS_ACCEL, but if you feel this is inconsistent, will
> change to use only one define.

That's basically what I said.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html