[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120718.143608.2101579052587289420.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: or.gerlitz@...il.com
Cc: roland@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ali@...lanox.com,
sean.hefty@...el.com, shlomop@...lanox.com, erezsh@...lanox.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 1/9] IB/ipoib: Add support for clones /
multiple childs on the same partition
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:24:58 +0300
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:38 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
>
>>> All sorts of childs are still created/deleted through sysfs, in a
>>> similar manner to the way legacy child interfaces are.
>
>> Network device instantiation of this type is the domain of
>> rtnl_link_ops rather than ugly sysfs interfaces.
>
> Didn't add any **new** sysfs interfaces in this patch. The IPoIB sysfs
> entries to create child devices are there from IPoIB's day one, and
> we're only extending them a tiny bit.
That's extremely unfortunate, having private ways of instantiating
networking devices leads to an extremely poor user experience.
Would you like to have to train every single user in the case
where each and every driver author makes his own unique way
of configuring his hardware?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists