netdev - Re: [RFC] r8169 : why SG / TX checksum are default disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342649136.2626.3757.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:05:36 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hayeswang@...ltek.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] r8169 : why SG / TX checksum are default disabled

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 23:44 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
> [...]
> > A NETDEV_TX_OK return means we accepted the SKB, it doesn't look like
> > that's what you are doing in the skb_padto() failure path.
> 
> ?
> 
> - skb_padto fails
>   (original skb is implicitely freed)
> - skb_padto returns error status (!= 0)
> - rtl8169_tso_csum returns false
> - start_xmit returns NETDEV_TX_OK. 
> 
> I'll search the missing "!" after some sleep if that's what you are talking
> about. Otherwise than that, I don't get it.
> 


Yes, I believe your patch is fine.

In fact many drivers dont account the error in their stats.

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html