| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120718142632.GF25563@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:26:32 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: cgroup: fix access the unallocated memory in
netprio cgroup
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:10:18AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 7/18/2012 5:21 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:47:25PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> >>On 7/12/2012 12:50 AM, Gao feng wrote:
> >>>there are some out of bound accesses in netprio cgroup.
> >>>
> >>>now before accessing the dev->priomap.priomap array,we only check
> >>>if the dev->priomap exist.and because we don't want to see
> >>>additional bound checkings in fast path, so we should make sure
> >>>that dev->priomap is null or array size of dev->priomap.priomap
> >>>is equal to max_prioidx + 1;
> >>>
> >>>so in write_priomap logic,we should call extend_netdev_table when
> >>>dev->priomap is null and dev->priomap.priomap_len < max_len.
> >>>and in cgrp_create->update_netdev_tables logic,we should call
> >>>extend_netdev_table only when dev->priomap exist and
> >>>dev->priomap.priomap_len < max_len.
> >>>
> >>>and it's not needed to call update_netdev_tables in write_priomap,
> >>>we can only allocate the net device's priomap which we change through
> >>>net_prio.ifpriomap.
> >>>
> >>>this patch also add a return value for update_netdev_tables &
> >>>extend_netdev_table, so when new_priomap is allocated failed,
> >>>write_priomap will stop to access the priomap,and return -ENOMEM
> >>>back to the userspace to tell the user what happend.
> >>>
> >>>Change From v3:
> >>>1. add rtnl protect when reading max_prioidx in write_priomap.
> >>>
> >>>2. only call extend_netdev_table when map->priomap_len < max_len,
> >>> this will make sure array size of dev->map->priomap always
> >>> bigger than any prioidx.
> >>>
> >>>3. add a function write_update_netdev_table to make codes clear.
> >>>
> >>>Change From v2:
> >>>1. protect extend_netdev_table by RTNL.
> >>>2. when extend_netdev_table failed,call dev_put to reduce device's refcount.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> >>>Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> >>>Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >>>---
> >>> net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>>+
> >>>+static int update_netdev_tables(void)
> >>>+{
> >>>+ int ret = 0;
> >>> struct net_device *dev;
> >>>- u32 max_len = atomic_read(&max_prioidx) + 1;
> >>>+ u32 max_len;
> >>> struct netprio_map *map;
> >>
> >>
> >>need to check if net subsystem is initialized before we try
> >>to use it here...
> >>
> >> if (some_check) -> need to lookup what this check is
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >>>
> >>> rtnl_lock();
> >>>+ max_len = atomic_read(&max_prioidx) + 1;
> >>> for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
> >>> map = rtnl_dereference(dev->priomap);
> >>>- if ((!map) ||
> >>>- (map->priomap_len < max_len))
> >>>- extend_netdev_table(dev, max_len);
> >>>+ /*
> >>>+ * don't allocate priomap if we didn't
> >>>+ * change net_prio.ifpriomap (map == NULL),
> >>>+ * this will speed up skb_update_prio.
> >>>+ */
> >>>+ if (map && map->priomap_len < max_len) {
> >>>+ ret = extend_netdev_table(dev, max_len);
> >>>+ if (ret < 0)
> >>>+ break;
> >>>+ }
> >>> }
> >>> rtnl_unlock();
> >>>+ return ret;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_create(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> >>> {
> >>> struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs;
> >>>- int ret;
> >>>+ int ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> cs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> if (!cs)
> >>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>
> >>>- if (cgrp->parent && cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp->parent)->prioidx) {
> >>>- kfree(cs);
> >>>- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >>>- }
> >>>+ if (cgrp->parent && cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp->parent)->prioidx)
> >>>+ goto out;
> >>>
> >>> ret = get_prioidx(&cs->prioidx);
> >>>- if (ret != 0) {
> >>>+ if (ret < 0) {
> >>> pr_warn("No space in priority index array\n");
> >>>- kfree(cs);
> >>>- return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >>>+ goto out;
> >>>+ }
> >>>+
> >>>+ ret = update_netdev_tables();
> >>>+ if (ret < 0) {
> >>>+ put_prioidx(cs->prioidx);
> >>>+ goto out;
> >>> }
> >>
> >>Gao,
> >>
> >>This introduces a null ptr dereference when netprio_cgroup is built
> >>into the kernel because update_netdev_tables() depends on init_net.
> >>However cgrp_create is being called by cgroup_init before
> >>do_initcalls() is called and before net_dev_init().
> >>
> >>.John
> >>
> >Not sure I follow here John. Shouldn't init_net be initialized prior to any
> >network devices getting registered? In other words, shouldn't for_each_netdev
> >just result in zero iterations through the loop?
> >Neil
> >
>
> init_net _is_ initialized prior to any network devices getting
> registered but not before cgrp_create called via cgroup_init.
>
> #define for_each_netdev(net, d) \
> list_for_each_entry(d, &(net)->dev_base_head, dev_list)
>
> but dev_base_head is zeroed at this time. In netdev_init we have,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->dev_base_head);
>
> but we haven't got that far yet because cgroup_init is called
> before do_initcalls().
>
ok, I see that, and it makes sense, but at this point I'm more concerned with
cgroups getting initalized twice. The early_init flag is clear in the
cgroup_subsystem for netprio, so we really shouldn't be getting initalized from
cgroup_init. We should be getting initalized from the module_init() call that
we register
Neil
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists