[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120718.090707.1241941591837985005.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ja@....bg
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Long term PMTU/redirect storage in ipv4.
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:36:08 +0300 (EEST)
> Is the cost of read_seqbegin a problem? Here is a
> 2nd version, I still keep this first check for now.
No, the read side of seqlocks are extremely cheap, it's just a plain
read and compare of a read-mostly integer.
> Subject: [PATCH v2] ipv4: use seqlock for nh_exceptions
>
> From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>
> Use global seqlock for the nh_exceptions. Call
> fnhe_oldest with the right hash chain. Correct the diff
> value for dst_set_expires.
>
> v2: after suggestions from Eric Dumazet:
> * get rid of spin lock fnhe_lock, rearrange update_or_create_fnhe
> * continue daddr search in rt_bind_exception
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> ---
I think if you get a seqlock mis-compare, you will need to branch back
to rescan the hash chain from the beginning.
Otherwise I like these changes a lot.
We should perhaps consider doing something similar in the TCP metrics
code.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists