netdev - Re: [patch iproute2] iplink: add support for num[tr]xqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120720.111001.1009240125448618151.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:	stephen.hemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2] iplink: add support for num[tr]xqueues

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:08:13 +0200

> Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:52:18PM CEST, stephen.hemminger@...tta.com wrote:
>>I like the option, but  numtxqueue is too verbose for the syntax model
>>of iproute. Why not use txq and rxq?
> 
> There is "txqueuelen" present already in iplink. I tried to be uniform here.
> Isn't "txq" and "rxq" rather too short? And afterall, these parameters
> are not supposed to be used on daily basis by anyone :)

Perhaps a good compromise is numtxq and numrxq?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html