[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5008B522.4030005@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:32:18 +0800
From: Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ipv6: fix incorrect route 'expires' value passed to
userspace
δΊ 2012-7-20 1:49, David Miller ει:
> From: Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:02:59 +0800
>
>>
>> When userspace use RTM_GETROUTE to dump route table, with an already
>> expired route entry, we always got an 'expires' value(2147157)
>> calculated base on INT_MAX.
>>
>> The reason of this problem is in the following satement:
>> rt->dst.expires - jiffies < INT_MAX
>> gcc promoted the type of both sides of '<' to unsigned long, thus
>> a small negative value would be considered greater than INT_MAX.
>>
>> This patch fix this by use the same trick as time_after macro to
>> avoid the 'unsigned long' type promotion and deal with jiffies
>> wrapping.
>>
>> Also we should do some fix in rtnl_put_cacheinfo() which use
>> jiffies_to_clock_t(which take an unsigned long as parameter) to
>> convert jiffies to clock_t to handle the negative expires.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Your patch is corrupted by your email client and therefore will
> not apply cleanly.
>
> I think this isn't the first time your patch submissions have
> had this problem, and if so then you should do the necessary
> work to prevent problem with more certainty in the future as
> such this makes a lot of extra work for other people.
>
Really sorry for that, I'll resend this patch and before that sending
myself a copy to confirm the mail client works properly.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists