netdev - Re: [PATCH] netns: correctly use per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:22:02 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<h.huangqiang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <yangzhenzhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: correctly use per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem

On 07/09/2012 07:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Huang Qiang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:05:09 +0800
> 
>> From: Yang Zhenzhang <yangzhenzhang@...wei.com>
>>
>> Now, kernel allows each net namespace to independently set up its levels
>> for tcp memory pressure thresholds.
>>
>> But it seems there is a bug, as using the following steps:
>>
>> [root@...t socket]# lxc-start -n test -f config /bin/bash
>> [root@...-test socket]# ip route add default via 192.168.58.2
>> [root@...-test socket]# echo 0 0 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem
>> [root@...-test socket]# scp root@....168.58.174:/home/tcp_mem_test .
>>
>> and it still can transport the "tcp_mem_test" file which we hope it
>> would not.
>>
>> It's because inet_init() (net/ipv4/af_inet.c)initialize the
>> tcp_prot.sysctl_mem:
>> tcp_prot.sysctl_mem = init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mem;
>>
>> So when the protocal is TCP, sk->sk_prot->sysctl_mem(following code)
>> always use the ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem of init_net namespace rather than
>> it's own net namespace.
>> This patch simply set "prot" equal to net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mem when
>> the protocol type is TCP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhenzhang <yangzhenzhang@...wei.com>
> 
> Another regression added by the socket memory cgroup code, BIG
> SURPRISE.
> 

Back from vacations: If I understand the submission correctly, this is
not a regression, since it seems to be only happening when those values
are set inside the network namespace - which was not possible before.

In any case, I believe from what I can see that the fix is already in
the way (haven't seen the whole backlog yet)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html