[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342761865.2626.5572.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:24:25 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: add 64 bit stats
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 06:53 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 21:56 -0400, Kevin Groeneveld wrote:
>
> > I am still trying to make sure I understand this fully. I want to
> > update some other drivers with 64 bit stats as well. What you said
> > seems to make sense, but...
> >
> > I was looking at the virtio_net.c driver. One spot in this driver
> > which updates the stats is the receive_buf function. recive_buf is
> > called from virtnet_poll which is registered as a napi poll function.
> > According to Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt the poll function
> > is called in a softirq context. However, the function which reads the
> > stats uses u64_stats_fetch_begin/u64_stats_fetch_retry. Shouldn't
> > this be u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh/u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh for the
> > exact reasons you described for my b44 patch?
>
> Absolutely. You can argue that probably nobody use this driver on a
> 32bit UP machine, but technically speaking the current implementation is
> racy.
>
In fact all network drivers should use the _bh version.
Could you send a patch for all of them, based on net-next tree ?
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists