netdev - Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Add support for EEH error recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZOPZL=Dw4GK0fV+_cC-TTRoYxkEhe9KBg-6G9LE=xrK3b7jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:02:10 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jackm@....mellanox.co.il,
	yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il, cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, shlomop@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Add support for EEH error recovery

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:44 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> But ACK his patch, because you have not found any problems with it.

Again, we wanted to test the patch before providing ACK, and it takes us a
bit to catch up on testing of this area, happens.


> This is taking days, and you're stalling further progress.
> I never let patches rot in patchwork more than a few days, as this patch has already.
> Either ACK or provide a legitimate reason to reject it now.

understood. As its a bit off working hours here now, lets see what
tomorrow yield testing wise - but by tomorrow we either ACK or provide
reason to reject/change it.

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html