[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500E9F2E.4010209@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:12:14 -0300
From: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
CC: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jackm@....mellanox.co.il, yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il,
cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
shlomop@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Add support for EEH error recovery
On 07/23/2012 06:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> For powerpc we have an IBM internal user space tool that injects the
>>> error on the bus with the aid of the system firmware. The kernel used
>>> was built with the option:
>>> CONFIG_EEH=y
>>> and without the AER options. I will run some more tests with the AER
>>> options activated.
>
>> I tested the powerpc error injection with
>>
>> CONFIG_EEH=y
>> CONFIG_PCIEAER=y
>> CONFIG_PCIEAER_INJECT=m
>>
>> and with the aer_inject module loaded and it didn't affect the EEH
>> recovery, the adapter recovered as expected.
>
> I wasn't sure to follow what did you mean by "it didn't affect the EEH
> recovery", how did you use the aer_inject module, is that through
> user-space tool which is available for us?
I wanted to say that I was testing before only with the EEH option
activated, then I activated the AER options on my powerpc system just to
make sure these options when activate wouldn't affect the EEH recovery.
I haven't injected and AER error since I don't have a system with
hardware support for it.
Thanks,
--
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists