lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343189061.2626.11073.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:04:21 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp: add 64 bit stats

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 22:27 -0400, Kevin Groeneveld wrote:

> After looking at the existing ppp code more I wonder if I would even
> need to add my own spinlocks.  It seems the only spots I am updating
> the 64 bit stats are already protected by either ppp->wlock or
> ppp->rlock spinlocks.  If I used two separate u64_stats_sync
> structures, one for tx stats and one for rx stats, wouldn't the
> existing spinlocks be enough?

It there are spinlocks already, why even adding u64_stats_sync ?

Just use existing spinlocks to protect your new u64 fields (in the
ngso_get_stats64())



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ