[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343199114.2626.11088.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:51:54 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, David.Laight@...LAB.COM,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ipv6: fix incorrect route 'expires' value passed to
userspace
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:25 +0800, Li Wei wrote:
> When userspace use RTM_GETROUTE to dump route table, with an already
> expired route entry, we always got an 'expires' value(2147157)
> calculated base on INT_MAX.
>
> The reason of this problem is in the following satement:
> rt->dst.expires - jiffies < INT_MAX
> gcc promoted the type of both sides of '<' to unsigned long, thus
> a small negative value would be considered greater than INT_MAX.
>
> This patch fix this by use the same trick as time_after macro to
> avoid the 'unsigned long' type promotion and deal with jiffies
> wrapping.
>
> Also we should do some fix in rtnl_put_cacheinfo() which use
> jiffies_to_clock_t(which take an unsigned long as parameter) to
> convert jiffies to clock_t to handle the negative expires.
>
> With the help of David Laight, we can make the code a little clean.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wei <lw@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 3 ++-
> net/ipv6/route.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 334b930..2e96396 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,8 @@ int rtnl_put_cacheinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *dst, u32 id,
> };
>
> if (expires)
> - ci.rta_expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(expires);
> + ci.rta_expires = expires > 0 ? jiffies_to_clock_t(expires)
> + : -jiffies_to_clock_t(-expires);
>
> return nla_put(skb, RTA_CACHEINFO, sizeof(ci), &ci);
> }
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index cf02cb9..6efeb28 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -2480,12 +2480,13 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
> goto nla_put_failure;
> if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_PRIORITY, rt->rt6i_metric))
> goto nla_put_failure;
> - if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES))
> + if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)) {
> expires = 0;
> - else if (rt->dst.expires - jiffies < INT_MAX)
> - expires = rt->dst.expires - jiffies;
> - else
> - expires = INT_MAX;
> + } else {
> + expires = (long)rt->dst.expires - (long)jiffies;
> + if (expires != (int)expires)
> + expires = expires > 0 ? INT_MAX : INT_MIN;
> + }
>
> if (rtnl_put_cacheinfo(skb, &rt->dst, 0, expires, rt->dst.error) < 0)
> goto nla_put_failure;
All this sounds not very clean.
rtnl_put_cacheinfo( ... long expires ... )
Any out of bound checks should be done in rtnl_put_cacheinfo(), _after_
conversion to clock_t.
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 334b930..c1c950b 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -625,9 +625,13 @@ int rtnl_put_cacheinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *dst, u32 id,
.rta_id = id,
};
- if (expires)
- ci.rta_expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(expires);
+ if (expires) {
+ unsigned long clock;
+ clock = jiffies_to_clock_t(abs(expires));
+ clock = min_t(unsigned long, clock, INT_MAX);
+ ci.rta_expires = (expires > 0) ? clock : -clock;
+ }
return nla_put(skb, RTA_CACHEINFO, sizeof(ci), &ci);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtnl_put_cacheinfo);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index cf02cb9..8e80fd2 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -2480,12 +2480,8 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
goto nla_put_failure;
if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_PRIORITY, rt->rt6i_metric))
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES))
- expires = 0;
- else if (rt->dst.expires - jiffies < INT_MAX)
- expires = rt->dst.expires - jiffies;
- else
- expires = INT_MAX;
+
+ expires = (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) ? rt->dst.expires - jiffies : 0;
if (rtnl_put_cacheinfo(skb, &rt->dst, 0, expires, rt->dst.error) < 0)
goto nla_put_failure;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists