[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343256239.5132.150.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:43:59 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC NET-NEXT PATCH 5/6] e1000e: implement MDI/MDI-X control
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 11:00 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> some users report issues with link failing when connected to certain
> switches. This gives the user the ability to control the MDI state
> from the driver, allowing users to work around some improperly
> behaving switches.
>
> forcing in this driver is for now only allowed when auto-neg is
> enabled.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
[...]
> @@ -241,6 +246,10 @@ static int e1000_set_spd_dplx(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 spd, u8 dplx)
> default:
> goto err_inval;
> }
> +
> + /* clear MDI, MDI(-X) override is only allowed when autoneg enabled */
> + adapter->hw.phy.mdix = AUTO_ALL_MODES;
> +
[...]
I have the same question about this assignment as in e1000.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists