netdev - Re: [PATCH] vxge: Declare MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50129267.7000504@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:06:47 -0600
From:	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
To:	Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vxge: Declare MODULE_FIRMWARE usage

On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com> wrote:
>> Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c |    9 +++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
>> index de21904..d4832b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
>> @@ -4203,6 +4203,9 @@ out:
>>          return ret;
>>   }
>>
>> +#define VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE "vxge/X3fw-pxe.ncf"
>> +#define VXGE_FIRMWARE "vxge/X3fw.ncf"
>> +
>>   static int vxge_probe_fw_update(struct vxgedev *vdev)
>>   {
>>          u32 maj, min, bld;
>> @@ -4245,9 +4248,9 @@ static int vxge_probe_fw_update(struct vxgedev *vdev)
>>                          }
>>          }
>>          if (gpxe)
>> -               fw_name = "vxge/X3fw-pxe.ncf";
>> +               fw_name = VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE;
>>          else
>> -               fw_name = "vxge/X3fw.ncf";
>> +               fw_name = VXGE_FIRMWARE;
>>
>>          ret = vxge_fw_upgrade(vdev, fw_name, 0);
>>          /* -EINVAL and -ENOENT are not fatal errors for flashing firmware on
>> @@ -4855,3 +4858,5 @@ vxge_closer(void)
>>   }
>>   module_init(vxge_starter);
>>   module_exit(vxge_closer);
>> +MODULE_FIRMWARE(VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE);
>> +MODULE_FIRMWARE(VXGE_FIRMWARE);
>
> IIUC, MODULE_FIRMWARE is only necessary for devices that need firmware
> to operate.  vxge hardware has an image in flash on the nic, and the
> modified code is used to update the firmware image on the adapter.
> So, this change isn't doing what you want it to do.
>
> Also, wasn't this already discussed (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/12/401)?
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>

Hmm, I'd forgotten about that discussion, but its no more correct now 
then it was then. MODULE_FIRMWARE is purely informational and has _no_ 
runtime impact. It is merely an indicator that a firmware file _might_ 
be used by the kernel and should therefore be left in the external 
firmware package. MODULE_FIRMWARE() uses the same base MODULE_INFO macro 
as MODULE_VERSION, MODULE_AUTHOR, MODULE_LICENSE, etc.

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@...onical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html