[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120726.200846.66786272076299783.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Remove the ipv4 routing cache
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:14:55 -0700
> Any idea why these look-ups are so expensive in the first place? When
> I dump fib_trie it doesn't look like I have much there. I would have
> thought the table would be pretty static with just 8 flows all going
> to the same destination address, but it seems like I was getting hit
> with cache misses for some reason.
A lot of the overhead comes from write traffic that results from
filling in the "fib_result" structure onto the callers stack.
The return value from a fib_lookup() has far too many components. But
simplifying things is not easy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists