netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO per skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1343676952.2667.26.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:35:52 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO
 per skb

On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:31 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 18:16 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > A peer (or local user) may cause TCP to use a nominal MSS of as little
> > as 88 (actual MSS of 76 with timestamps).  Given that we have a
> > sufficiently prodigious local sender and the peer ACKs quickly enough,
> > it is nevertheless possible to grow the window for such a connection
> > to the point that we will try to send just under 64K at once.  This
> > results in a single skb that expands to 861 segments.
> > 
> > In some drivers with TSO support, such an skb will require hundreds of
> > DMA descriptors; a substantial fraction of a TX ring or even more than
> > a full ring.  The TX queue selected for the skb may stall and trigger
> > the TX watchdog repeatedly (since the problem skb will be retried
> > after the TX reset).  This particularly affects sfc, for which the
> > issue is designated as CVE-2012-3412.  However it may be that some
> > hardware or firmware also fails to handle such an extreme TSO request
> > correctly.
> > 
> > Therefore, limit the number of segments per skb to 100.  This should
> > make no difference to behaviour unless the actual MSS is less than
> > about 700.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> > ---
> 
> 
> Hmm, isnt GRO path also vulnerable ?

You mean, for forwarding?  If page fragments are used, the number of
segments is limited to MAX_SKB_FRAGS < 100.  But if skbs are aggregated
and build_skb() is not used (e.g. due to jumbo MTU) it appears we would
need an explicit limit.  Something like this:

---
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] tcp: Limit number of segments merged by GRO

In the case where GRO aggregates skbs that cannot be converted to
page-fragments, there is currently no limit to the number of
segments that may be merged and subsequently re-segmented by GSO.

Apply the same limit as was introduced for locally-generated GSO skbs
in 'tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO per skb'.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 51d8daf..a052d07 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -3144,7 +3144,8 @@ out_check_final:
 					TCP_FLAG_RST | TCP_FLAG_SYN |
 					TCP_FLAG_FIN));
 
-	if (p && (!NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->same_flow || flush))
+	if (p && (!NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->same_flow || flush ||
+		  NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->count == TCP_MAX_GSO_SEGS))
 		pp = head;
 
 out:
---

> An alternative would be to drop such frames in the ndo_start_xmit(), and
> cap sk->sk_gso_max_size (since skb are no longer orphaned...)

I have implemented that workaround for the out-of-tree version of sfc.
For the in-tree driver, I thought it would be better to limit the number
of segments at source, which will avoid penalising any cases where the
window can grow so much larger than MSS.

> Or you could introduce a new wk->sk_gso_max_segments, that your sfc
> driver sets to whatever limit ?

Yes, that's another option.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html