lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343686857.2667.60.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:20:57 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: Limit number of segments generated by GSO
 per skb

On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 14:46 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:35:52 +0100
> 
> > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:31 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Or you could introduce a new wk->sk_gso_max_segments, that your sfc
> >> driver sets to whatever limit ?
> > 
> > Yes, that's another option.
> 
> This is how I want this handled.

How should that be applied in the GRO-forwarding case?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ