netdev - Re: CPU: 0 Not tainted (3.1.9+ #1) when ifconfig rose0 down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120731175842.GA845@belle.intranet.vanheusden.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:58:43 +0200
From:	folkert <folkert@...heusden.com>
To:	Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...e.fr>
Cc:	linux-hams <linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CPU: 0 Not tainted  (3.1.9+ #1) when ifconfig rose0 down

> Here is a complementary observation.
> Trying to remove rose module with rmmod rose did not create any
> kernel panic.

A while ago I wrote a script that at random removed and inserted modules
into the system and that gave surprising results: not only crashing
system, also corrupt filesystems etc. Filed a bug-report and I was told
that removing a module might work but there's no guarantee.



Folkert van Heusden

-- 
Feeling generous? -> http://www.vanheusden.com/wishlist.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html