netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv4: remove parentheses in return statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120803.015243.1041602621154758483.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sakiwit@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: remove parentheses in return statement

From: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
Date: Fri,  3 Aug 2012 01:43:10 -0600

> It is always wrong to write 'return (...)'.

In your imagination.

> After removal, realign the code where necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>

> -	return ((val ^ (val >> 8) ^ (val >> 16) ^ (val >> 24)) &
> -		(IN4_ADDR_HSIZE - 1));
> +	return (val ^ (val >> 8) ^ (val >> 16) ^ (val >> 24)) &
> +	       (IN4_ADDR_HSIZE - 1);

Those parenthesis are there to make the evaluation order and
grouping explicit.

The other ones you changed are wrong for similar reasons.

I absolutely am not applying patches like this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html