[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343985428.9299.868.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:17:08 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll()
and __netpoll_setup()
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 23:37 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called
> with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
> memory.
>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
> net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 6fae5f3..ab773d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static inline int slave_enable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
> struct netpoll *np;
> int err = 0;
>
> - np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
> + np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_ATOMIC);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> if (!np)
> goto out;
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index b4c90e4..c78a966 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev)
> }
>
> if (!ndev->npinfo) {
> - npinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*npinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> + npinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*npinfo), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!npinfo) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
Yes this works, but maybe you instead could pass/add a gfp_t flags
argument to __netpoll_setup() ?
Management tasks should allow GFP_KERNEL allocations to have less
failure risks.
Its sad bonding uses the rwlock here instead of a mutex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists