[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120803.143133.1203794725115288810.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sakiwit@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: remove parentheses in return statement
From: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:23:50 -0600
> To illustrate, the patch merely changes
>
> return (A);
>
> to
>
> return A;
Life is not black and white my friend, there are shades
of gray. I feel bad for you if you read coding style rules
in a %100 literal sense with no room for interpretation.
People add extra parenthesis to add clarity, so you are
entirely misrepresenting these cases.
This was not a simple case of:
return (A);
but more like something that looks as:
return ((A & B) | (C ^ D));
and that is perfectly fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists