[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501C5005.2090107@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:26:13 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/7] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
On 08/04/2012 12:23 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:20:02AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 11:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> I forgot to comment on that one, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> If we put hash entries after struct hash_table we don't take the
>>>> bits field size into account, or did I miss something?
>>>
>>> So, if you do the following,
>>>
>>> struct {
>>> struct {
>>> int i;
>>> long ar[];
>>> } B;
>>> long __ar_storage[32];
>>> } A;
>>
>> struct A should have been an union, right?
>
> I actually meant an enclosing struct. When you're defining a struct
> member, simply putting the storage after a struct with var array
> should be good enough. If that doesn't work, quite a few things in
> the kernel will break.
Ah, I see, I've missed that part.
Thanks!
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists