lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kg2my0wkfkapuq8el3jxpb8a.1344186435987@email.android.com>
Date:	Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:08:34 +0200
From:	Folkert van Heusden <folkert.van.heusden@...il.com>
To:	Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...e.fr>,
	folkert <folkert@...heusden.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-hams <linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CPU: 0 Not tainted  (3.1.9+ #1) when ifconfig rose0 down

Good luck!
I'm to busy myself with debugging the baycom driver.
Can do at most 2 steps a day and it are 15 steps... (54k changesets)

Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...e.fr> wrote:

>Thanks for suggesting a bissect. However I guess that this bug has 
>always been there !
>
>I am not professionaly involved in programming, however I committed a 
>few patches for ROSE, AX.25 and NetRom modules since a few years.
>
>I reactivated netconfig and here is the report showing that kernel panic 
>occurs when rose_device_event is triggered when issuing command
>ifconfig rose0 down
>
>[ 1215.153302] rose_kill_by_device() rose->neighbour->use 0
>[ 1215.153316] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
>000000000000002a
>[ 1215.153321] IP: [<ffffffffa065e37d>] rose_device_event+0x11d/0x160 [rose]
>[ 1215.153333] PGD 36340067 PUD 359fa067 PMD 0
>[ 1215.153338] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>[ 1215.153343] CPU 1
>[ 1215.153344] Modules linked in: af_packet rose mkiss ax25 nfsd 
>exportfs nfs nfs_acl auth_rpcgss fscache lockd sunrpc netconsole 
>configfs bnep bluetooth rfkill snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_intel 
>snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd 
>i82975x_edac soundcore e1000e ppdev parport_pc parport edac_core 
>iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support serio_raw i2c_i801 processor coretemp evdev 
>ipv6 autofs4 usbhid hid ext4 crc16 jbd2 sd_mod crc_t10dif firewire_ohci 
>firewire_core ehci_hcd crc_itu_t uhci_hcd usbcore usb_common nouveau 
>button video mxm_wmi wmi i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ttm drm i2c_core 
>ahci libahci ata_piix pata_marvell libata scsi_mod [last unloaded: 
>microcode]
>[ 1215.153395]
>[ 1215.153398] Pid: 18637, comm: ifconfig Not tainted 3.4.7 #8 
>/D975XBX2
>[ 1215.153404] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa065e37d>]  [<ffffffffa065e37d>] 
>rose_device_event+0x11d/0x160 [rose]
>[ 1215.153411] RSP: 0000:ffff880035271ca8  EFLAGS: 00010296
>[ 1215.153414] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88003d0c2838 RCX: 
>0000000230924000
>[ 1215.153417] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 
>ffffffffa0665f28
>[ 1215.153420] RBP: ffff880035271cb8 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 
>0000000000000000
>[ 1215.153422] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
>ffff88003a9e1000
>[ 1215.153425] R13: 00000000fffffff1 R14: ffffffffa05b0000 R15: 
>0000000000000000
>[ 1215.153429] FS:  00007fb7a318f700(0000) GS:ffff88003fa80000(0000) 
>knlGS:0000000000000000
>[ 1215.153433] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>[ 1215.153435] CR2: 000000000000002a CR3: 00000000393fd000 CR4: 
>00000000000007e0
>[ 1215.153438] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
>0000000000000000
>[ 1215.153441] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 
>0000000000000400
>[ 1215.153445] Process ifconfig (pid: 18637, threadinfo 
>ffff880035270000, task ffff88003f5f5d90)
>[ 1215.153448] Stack:
>[ 1215.153450]  0000000000000002 ffff88003a9e1000 ffff880035271cf8 
>ffffffff8146d86d
>[ 1215.153455]  ffff880036040d00 0000000000000002 ffff88003a9e1000 
>0000000000000000
>[ 1215.153459]  00000000ffffff9d 0000000000000000 ffff880035271d08 
>ffffffff8107a2b6
>[ 1215.153464] Call Trace:
>[ 1215.153470]  [<ffffffff8146d86d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
>[ 1215.153476]  [<ffffffff8107a2b6>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
>[ 1215.153483]  [<ffffffff81395136>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x36/0x60
>[ 1215.153487]  [<ffffffff8139b9ea>] __dev_notify_flags+0x6a/0x90
>[ 1215.153491]  [<ffffffff8139ba55>] dev_change_flags+0x45/0x70
>[ 1215.153496]  [<ffffffff81403aed>] devinet_ioctl+0x61d/0x7b0
>[ 1215.153500]  [<ffffffff81403f05>] inet_ioctl+0x75/0x90
>[ 1215.153505]  [<ffffffff8137fbd0>] sock_do_ioctl+0x30/0x70
>[ 1215.153509]  [<ffffffff8137fc89>] sock_ioctl+0x79/0x2f0
>[ 1215.153514]  [<ffffffff811829d8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x98/0x560
>[ 1215.153517]  [<ffffffff81182f31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0
>[ 1215.153522]  [<ffffffff81471b39>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>[ 1215.153525] Code: e0 5b 41 5c 31 c0 5d c3 48 8d 7b c8 31 c9 ba 09 00 
>00 00 be 65 00 00 00 e8 a1 5c 00 00 48 8b 83 b8 04 00 00 48 c7 c7 28 5f 
>66 a0 <66> 83 68 2a 01 48 8b 83 b8 04 00 00 0f b7 70 2a 31 c0 e8 d4 10
>[ 1215.153561] RIP  [<ffffffffa065e37d>] rose_device_event+0x11d/0x160 
>[rose]
>[ 1215.153567]  RSP <ffff880035271ca8>
>[ 1215.153569] CR2: 000000000000002a
>[ 1215.177577] ---[ end trace d23a7ddff228876c ]---
>[ 1215.177589] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>[ 1215.177662] panic occurred, switching back to text console
>[ 1215.177717] Rebooting in 60 seconds..
>
>I inserted some printk into rose_device_event() and commented calls to 
>subroutines.
>Without calling subroutines, there is no more kernel panic.
>Same results when replacing rose_kill_by_device() in net/rose/af_rose.c, 
>rose_link_device_down() and rose_rt_device() in
>net/rose_route.c by a dummy functions with just a printk inside.
>
>I am glad that I found make parameters that shorten the debugging
>cycle :
>
>make modules SUBDIRS=net/rose
>make modules_install SUBDIRS=net/rose
>
>Now I have to go further into each subroutines step by step in order to 
>find out the falty code !
>
>
>Bernard
>
>
>On 03/08/2012 16:32, folkert wrote:
>>> You might want to simply try moving unregister_netdevice_notifier a bit
>>> earlier in rose_exit and see if that helps.  Otherwise I would recommend
>>> instrumenting the code up with some printk so you can understand what
>>> part of unregistration is failing.
>>
>> Or bisect! Give e.g. the oldest 2.6 kernel a try to find a last known
>> good and then do a bisect upto a known bad kernel.
>>
>>
>> Folkert van Heusden
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ