[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHo-OowanCoYkNiyGs1aYMAmxLcEXRZeeZ3WMxi+HaCZTXUCTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 00:27:36 -0700
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Bridge extensions to iproute2
Yes, there really isn't much reason for bridge configuration to be a
separate package than iproute, seeing how there's vlan/veth etc
configuration built into 'ip'
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen.hemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> There is barely any overlap between bridge-utils and iproute2.
> I was thinking of making a script 'brctl' that does same thing as
> old utility but using new netlink based commands.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists