netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] igb: use build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1344277315.26674.54.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:21:55 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] igb: use build_skb()

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 10:35 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:

> I was planning to move igb over to an ixgbe style receive path at some
> point anyway.  Since it seems like this is now a higher priority I
> figured I would try to get the patches for it implemented in the next
> week or so.  Would there be any issue with us rejecting this patch and
> instead switching igb over to the ixgbe style path?

It seems I missed this part.

I use igb on my dev machine, not on prod machines, so if you are moving
igb to ixgbe, I can certainly can maintain my patch in my tree, while
you make your changes.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html