netdev - RE: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6349D7A510622448B1BA0967850A8438013693DD@NASANEXD02D.na.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:49:25 +0000
From:	"Ren, Cloud" <cjren@....qualcomm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	qca-linux-team <qca-linux-team@...lcomm.com>,
	nic-devel <nic-devel@...lcomm.com>,
	"Huang, Xiong" <xiong@....qualcomm.com>,
	"hao-ran.liu@...onical.com" <hao-ran.liu@...onical.com>,
	"Rodriguez, Luis" <rodrigue@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver



>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>Sent: 2012年8月9日 14:18
>To: Ren, Cloud
>Cc: joe@...ches.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>qca-linux-team; nic-devel; Huang, Xiong; hao-ran.liu@...onical.com; Rodriguez,
>Luis
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver
>
>From: "Ren, Cloud" <cjren@....qualcomm.com>
>Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 04:44:08 +0000
>
>> I only want to do some additional explanations to david. It makes nothing with
>original patch.
>
>Stop this TOP POSTING, it's bad etiquette on a technical mailing list.
>
>Look at how other people write their email responses on this mailing list.  They
>first provide a quoted portion of what they are replying
>to:
>
>> Quoted
>> something like this.
>
>And then they provide their response UNDERNEATH.
>
>When you provide your response at the top of the email, it is unexpected, and
>makes more work for people reading what you write.
>
>You guys are doing everything possibly wrong.
>
>You have unnecessarily quoted a HUGE patch just to provide some ancillary in
>formation.
>
>You are TOP POSTING.
>
>You added a signoff of someone who did not give you explicit permission to do
>so.
>
>And you seem to not comprehend nor care about the implications or effects of
>your actions that are hurting other people and creating a huge brudon.
>
>I very much intend to simply ignore your work completely until you can get your
>act in gear, write proper emails, and submit patches properly.
>
>It is the only deterrant I have for your incredibly rude and inconsiderate
>behavior.


Hi David,

Please calm down. I will follow rule of sending email from now on. Sorry for causing
your trouble. Luis has ever asked joe for adding as a Signed-off-by. At that time joe agreed
with it. If joe prefers his name not be listed as a Signed-off-by, I will respect his decision.
alx driver is innocent. Please help review.  Thanks

cloud