netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/14] bridge: add some comments for NETDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <uiuqn4l019wk5s0l9cq2w0cy.1344541199595@email.android.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:44:26 -1000
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] bridge: add some comments for NETDEV_RELEASE

If you are going to add an explanation, then I would prefer a more complete one. Something like:
"Since more than one interface can be attached to a bridge, there still maybe an alternate path for netconsole to use; therefore there is no reason for a NETDEV_RELEASE event."

But my opinion it really isn't necessary to document what isn't done in the code, only what is done. The purpose of comments is to explain the wider impacts of the code.